To contemporary
man, the concept of gods has been an interesting
topic. Particularly because of the fact that one
lives in a time when monotheist beliefs dominate,
the concept of gods in mythology fascinate man.
The Iliad is one example of a presentation of
this kind. Indeed, this is elaborated on in several
books. However, one of the most interesting relations
of this story is Edith Hamilton’s Mythology.
This is because of the completeness she presents
the characters with. Indeed, the description of
Homer’s Iliad stretches the Judgment of
Paris right up till the founding of Roman. It
is evident that there is a serious amount of interest
in Homer’s Iliad, as it reveals a great
deal about the gods. There are particular parts
of the Iliad that are interesting regarding the
accounts of gods. Important parts of these accounts
include book 1 ("plague and wrath")
and book 22 ("the death of Hector").
It is for this reason that both these books will
be compared and contrasted.
As it appears, gods are important to all major
characters in the Iliad. It also appears that
without the concept of gods in this story, it
would be empty. This means that the role of the
gods themselves is vital, as they form a part
of every nearly character’s representation.
To begin with, both characters Homer and Achilles
converse with the gods. In book one the reader
witnesses Homer summon the goddess of poetry and
inspiration to sing out Achilles anger. Homer
says, “Sing, O goddess, the anger of Achilles
son of Peleus, that brought countless ills upon
the Achaeans” (Book 1, The Iliad). In contrast
to Homer calling upon the goddess, Achilles is
angered and answers back. In his answer, Achilles
says, “You have baulked me, Far-Darter,
most malicious of all gods, and have drawn me
away from the wall, … you have robbed me
of great glory and have saved the Trojans at no
risk to yourself, for you have nothing to fear,
but I would indeed have my revenge if it were
in my power to do so” (Book 22, The Iliad).
It is quite apparent that the two characters here
are ones that have conflicting approaches to their
communications with the gods. This is because
Homer invokes the goddess of poetry, and requests
her to sing for him. In contrast to this, Achilles
is an angered individual, and shows open his anger
at the gods. However, it is apparent also that
the gods did not really like him. This is expressed
in Priam’s words when hector went out to
face Achilles. He first says, “my son, stay
not to face this man alone and unsupported, or
you will meet death at the hands of the son of
Peleus, for he is mightier than you” (Book
22, The Iliad). These words of Priam announce
Achilles strength. However, the following words
speak of how well people knew their gods. Priam
cries out with confidence about what the gods
think of Achilles. He cries, “Monster that
he is; would indeed that the gods loved him no
better than I do, for so, dogs and vultures would
soon devour him as he lay stretched on earth,
and aload of grief would be lifted from my heart,
for many a brave son has he reft from me”
(Book 22, The Iliad).
The confidence that Priam has in the gods is
similar to Homer’s confidence in the goddess
of poetry when he invokes her. He was confident
of her arrival and her presentation. In addition
to this, one can also observe the similarity between
his words and Priam’s words when he refers
to the gods. Homer also speaks of death to men,
when he says, “Many a brave soul did it
send hurrying down to Hades, and many a hero did
it yield a prey to dogs and vultures” (Book
1, The Iliad). It is through these words that
one can detect a consensual view of the gods.
It is evident that everyone was aware of the power
of the gods; they knew that the gods had immense
power, and could grant wishes as well as unleash
their wrath upon those they found offensive. With
regard to those who invoked their names in times
of need, the gods certainly helped them. This
is witnessed when the Old Man was intimidated
by King Agamemnon. With apparently no other way
out other than obeying Agamemnon, the Old Man
prays to Apollo. He says, “O god of the
silver bow, that protectest Chryse and holy Cilla
and rulest Tenedos with thy might, hear me oh
thou of Sminthe. If I have ever decked your temple
with garlands, or burned your thigh-bones in fat
of bulls or goats, grant my prayer, and let your
arrows avenge these my tears upon the Danaans”
(Book 1, The Iliad). The old Man humbled himself
before Apollo, and his prayer was heard. The humility
observed in this prayer is in complete contrast
to what a reader witnesses when Achilles communicates
with the gods. Achilles was rude and blamed the
gods for whatever situation he was placed in.
Instead of asking the gods for guidance or help
he blamed them. This is a particular point at
which the old man differs from Achilles when they
communicate with the gods.
In addition to the humility through which the
old man was able to invoke Apollo, there are more
aspects of the gods visible. In book 1, it is
evident that the gods have immense power as well.
This is demonstrated in the following words, “if
we would escape destruction, for we are being
cut down by war and pestilence at once”
(Book 1, The Iliad). Through these words it is
evident that the gods could be angered or disappointed
and curse those who displease them. Due to this,
fear is the most natural reaction and is the reason
why the following words were uttered, “Let
us ask some priest or prophet, or some reader
of dreams (for dreams, too, are of Jove) who can
tell us why Phoebus Apollo is so angry”
(Book 1, The Iliad). Through this it is evident
that whatever the people were experiencing here
was believed to be the result of a curse or a
displeased god. “who can tell us why Phoebus
Apollo is so angry and say whether it is for some
vow that we have broken, or hecatomb that we have
not offered, and whether he will accept the savor
of lambs and goats without blemish, so as to take
away the plague from us” (Book 1, The Iliad).
Through these words it is evident that the people
also believe that the god could stop this wrath
if they offered something that could please him.
Reinforcing the way that the gods could be subdued
are the words of a god watching over hector when
Achilles was in pursuit of him. The Sire of gods
said, “Alas my eyes behold a man who is
dear to me being pursued round the walls of Troy;
my heart is full of pity for Hector, who has burned
the thigh-bones of many a heifer in my honor”
(Book 22, The Iliad). This means that whoever
is under pestilence may still have a chance of
saving themselves if they show their humility.
However, all the gods did not agree, and Hector
had to die before his people. It is evident here
in book 22 that the gods had to consensually agree
when they had to save pr condemn people. Indeed,
their powers would have a great deal to do with
what their decisions would be. With hector in
chapter 22, the view of gods tells one that they
had to agree with each other before they decided
to do anything. In contrast to this, in book 1,
the gods presented themselves and their attributes
independent of other gods. This is demonstrated
by the goddess of poetry as well as Apollo.