|
BMW case
study
Thesis Statement
This presentation is a case study that will look
into the strategy adopted by the world’s
leading German automobile manufacturer BMW. Besides
outlining the strategy the paper will also explore
what are the ways in which this strategy is being
implemented and what are the difficulties being
faced in such implementation. The paper will finally
close with a brief summary and conclusions.
Analysis
BMW makes cars that are a cut above what is produced
by the mass manufacturers like the Japanese Toyota,
and Nissan, the Italian Fiat, the French Peugeot,
the American Ford. It is more in line with the
German Mercedes or the English Jaguar. The BMW
name is synonymous with luxury, craftsmanship,
and all round excellence.
BMW has also maintained, besides its technical
and luxury features, the category of its automobiles,
which are the larger luxury sedans. It has carefully
avoided the smaller car market. However this is
where BMW has made a break from the past. It has
opted to diversify its range to include the small
to medium sized cars market.
Such diversification will give BMW an opportunity
to reach a much wider customer base. It gives
the manufacturer the opportunity tap into a new
market and have ready a hedge should it face possible
competitive pressures or problems in its traditional
category.
The cornerstone of this strategy is that it does
not call for down grading of any of the BMW features
in its smaller versions. The standards would be
religiously and uncompromisingly adhered to. And
neither is BMW going to dilute its return on investments
on the smaller cars. It aims to keep the profit
margins intact by creating real product differentiation.
On the face of it this looks to be a reasonably
safe venture. It makes perfectly good sense to
own a smaller car in view of the rising fuel costs.
After all Ford, Chrysler and General Motors have
come up with their smaller cars. And done well
at that. However it is slightly different with
BMW. Its image, appeal and halo have included
its size as well. A fundamental change may result
in loss of identity for a segment of its loyal
customers. It can be put this way: whoever will
look at a mini Rolls Royce with the same degree
of veneration! There are some things that are
taboo, just not done.
And yet the decision has been made and the strategy
has been implemented. So it is reasonable to assume
that all risk factors have been factored into
the new strategy.
The BMW Chief Executive Helmut Panke has aired
his views and it will be enlightening to know
these. Says he:
On developing smaller cars:
” The product initiative allows us to be
focused on market segments that we see developing
in the future. Tastes are changing. Customers
are slicing the market into more focused pieces.
It's becoming more differentiated.”
On the risks involved:
“Satisfying the market's demand for new
niche products is a strategic risk anyone in the
industry has to take. To be successful, you have
to fulfill 100% percent of customers”.
On profit margins:
”All our cars are developed with the same
target for return on investment (ROI)….
Mini delivers better performance and quality than
volume-market cars. Customers are willing to pay
for that”
On the size of cars:
We're making cars in the premium segment. And
premium does not depend on the size of a car”.
On decentralization Within BMW organization:
“Department managers have the ability to
decide without a committee… “
On employee motivation:
“Rule 7 states that it's the responsibility
of any manager to create an atmosphere of fun
in the organization. I make a personal point of
this. I believe in it -- it makes me tick. When
people work in a fun atmosphere it's very motivating.
I love my job.”
( BW Online | June 9, 2003 | BMW's Shifting Strategy
2003)
|