| We should understand
the evolution of the concept of globalization
to appreciate the concept of outsourcing. During
the last century developed countries prided on
their economic growth, prosperity and technological
advancement. The costs of production or services
did not so much matter. Wages were not perceived
as significant factor in the industry. The trend
was a flourishing domestic economy, employment
and exemplary export growth. Ironically the very
efforts of globalization and technology integration
have brought in their wake, cost comparison and
labor cost efficiency leading to outsourcing as
a preferred option by the turn of the century.
Now there is a raging debate on how to optimize
outsourcing if not curb it.
Outsourcing and globalilization
It is a mistake to view outsourcing as the Achilles
heel of only the US. No doubt, being in the leadership
position as a provider of goods and services in
a free market environment for so long, it has
come to be affected the most by offshore outsourcing.
With technology especially the information technology
making rapid strides with each passing year and
the world being christened as “Global Village”,
production of goods and services are migrating
to optimization pastures. Industries and corporations
cannot be blamed for such a phenomenon. Afterall
they are in the business of optimizing costs and
fattening profits. Otherwise they cannot survive.
Social responsibilities in terms of native country’s
interests and native work force cannot superimpose
themselves in a business context.
With the strong emergence of Internet technology
and trained manpower availability in other countries,
companies in developed countries are off loading
a lot of processes to other countries. To add
to the technology factors, liberalization of economies
around the world especially China, India, Russia,
and other Asian and Latin American countries has
meant those countries attracting more foreign
investments. This in turn becomes an attractive
investment proposition to Multi National Corporations
and divests proportionate capital from native
countries. This translates to migration of jobs
as well.
Domestic industries versus foreign competition
In almost all developing countries where there
is cheaper availability of labor, the companies
that can compete for outsourcing jobs are very
few indeed. So there is a limit to possible exploitation
by foreign companies. It is also of course true
that native skills are in short supply not withstanding
the wage disparity. The debate then is so much
on foreign versus domestic competition but on
core competencies and optimal manipulation of
them. Gregory Mankiw, the head of President George
W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers observed
that "outsourcing is just a new way of doing
international trade," which makes it "a
good thing."
The common charge is that the information revolution
has propelled the decimation of U.S. manufacturing
and facilitated the outsourcing of service-sector
jobs. Backroom call centers are being transformed
into high-level software programming packages.
Critics advocate that offshore outsourcing deserves
attention and that some measures to assist affected
workers are called for. But is such alarmist approach
going to do any good to the American workers in
the long run? Should Americans be concerned about
the economic effects of outsourcing? The answer
is not entirely simple. Available and reliable
data suggests that gross job losses due to offshore
outsourcing have been minimal when compared to
the size of the entire U.S. economy. The outsourcing
phenomenon has shown that globalization can affect
white-collar professions more, so far immune to
foreign competition, in the same way that it has
affected manufacturing jobs for years..
Some factors in favor of why
• Domestic Skill level can be updated
• Reorganization of business processes to
suit customer needs
• Development and implementation of relevant
software
• Cost optimization in other areas to compensate
for higher domestic wages
Some factors in favor of Why not
• High inventory costs.
• High personnel turnover.
• IT budget is not predictable or affordable.
• IT organization does not have a strong
grasp of company's objectives, critical success
factors and/or bottom line.
• IT organization does not provide industry
best practices, processes and/or services to internal/external
customers
• Need to focus on core business
While to the question of Why, all this furore
and concern (some of it politically motivated
and orchestrated) can be an answer, the answer
to why not has to be looked at in proper perspective
The creation of new jobs overseas will eventually
lead to economic prosperity and formation of capital
which will be ploughed back into the US economy
at some stage. It will lead to the cascading effect
of more jobs and higher incomes in the United
States. As noted earlier, the economy and especially
job growth is sluggish at the moment. So much
so it is not extremely fair to draw a straight
connection between offshore outsourcing and high
domestic unemployment.
Future Prospects
Future prospects are a function of the present
practices. Outsourcing occurs when a firm subcontracts
a business function to an outside supplier. This
practice has been common within the U.S. economy.
The reduction of communication costs and the standardization
of software packages have now made it possible
to outsource business functions such as customer
service, telemarketing, and document and data
management. Other affected professions include
medical transcription, tax preparation, banking
operations and financial services. All this is
a result of technological advancement and availability
of trained manpower and a climate of free flow
of global trade. It cannot be reversed as a corrective
measure by any one economy. On the other hand
generation of more capital through outsourcing
shall certainly lead to more economic activity,
more diversified business activity and better
prospects for the native work force as well. Cheaper
labor else where has to be countered not by reducing
wages but upgrading skills and utililising the
costly labor for matching jobs. So as long as
business is sustained and profits accrue prospects
will multiply. No ground for despair.
|